Transsexual Clichés in Film, Television and Print Media

 This little piece was originally written for a documentarian, but has been expanded and can inform any media piece about transsexual women. Its style and tone are conversational and idiomatic, reflecting the fact that these are my unpolished thoughts and this essay is not meant to be my perfectly considered "last word" on the subject. I write here almost exclusively about transsexual women (write what you know!), and will be interested to read a similar viewpoint from the trans male community when it is written. Someday I will probably reformat and footnote this essay, but until then I think the information can be useful to any media creator who wants to hear my perspective. Don't miss my 1,000,000+ view YouTube video "Bad Questions to Ask a Transsexual" for a humorous but informative slant on these issues.

I've participated in many documentaries, going back to at least 1993, and I've probably seen or am aware of most English language docs or films of the last several decades that deal with trans characters, as well as many foreign language films. While I've done my best to influence those in which I've participated, my awareness has had to evolve over time, and sometimes I was simply not in a position of power once my participation was done.

I have also participated in many narrative projects, including "Soldier's Girl", "Transamerica", "CSI", and "Casting Pearls". In addition to the points I make below about the storytelling in narrative projects, a major concern of mine as an actress, activist and consumer is that transsexual women are rarely allowed to play ourselves on screen. We are almost never allowed to play non-transsexual women.

In both docs and narrative films, some key patterns have become apparent to me which are still fairly invisible to many filmmakers, so I will share an abridged list of some that I feel are negative, false, tired (ie:overused) or wrongly applied to transsexual women. This list isn't intended to disparage the creative work of some very talented people, but I do feel it to be important to put this information out there. This is what transwomen who know something about film, tv and history are probably saying when they see these topics on screen.

Documentaries/Reality Television


These are some of the unfortunately "required" shots which can be found in most trans-focused documentaries and many trans-themed narratives:

This process focus is mostly due to the camera always being in the hands of cluelessly fascinated straight people, or gay/lesbian people who think they understand because they really liked "Priscilla, Queen of the Desert". I suppose you can tell that I get a little angry about some of the things I've seen, ha ha. I'm going to experiment with being a little more honest about these feelings in the coming months, so let's see how that works out.

Narrative Film/Television


Narrative filmmakers have been fascinated with transsexual people for as long as they have been aware of them. As an artist and storyteller myself, I understand that the journey of a transsexual character can seem like a bit of real magic happening in the mundane world... To the sympathetic eye, it can illustrate someone literally "transforming" from one thing into another thing, crossing some of the most basic divides in humanity: sex (physical characteristics) and gender (social roles). To the un-sympathetic eye, it can represent a profoundly disturbing freakishness that masquerades itself as "one of us" and walks among us, grotesque truth hidden by dark and forbidden alchemy of hormones and surgery and affect. Obviously, I ascribe to the former view when considering my own journey, choosing to find magic and evolution in my story.

Unfortunately most filmmakers (certainly not all... but most) pull a cardboard sketch of transsexuality out of their store of ideas and use it to illustrate one of four basic types:

And with these worn-out caricatures, they pepper their stories with a bit of drama, a laugh, a moment of "justified" revulsion or some sweet progressiveness-affirming pity.

Negative Focus

Genre writers especially love to write transsexual women characters as prostitutes (see every cop show ever on television, except for that very special episode of Andy Griffith they don't air anymore), the punchline/butt of a joke (see Ace Ventura: Pet Detective and Surreal Life:Alexis Arquette), noble victims (see Soldier's Girl, Gwen Araujo Story) and scarily mentally disturbed (see Silence of the Lambs or "Ava" in Nip/Tuck). Decades of these portrayals influence many documentarians, writers and filmmakers to seek out these archetypes or play up these traits in their subjects, whether they realize they're doing it or not. "I'm going to write a transsexual character... I guess I should read up on prostitutes!" or "I'm going to write a transsexual character... I guess I should crack open some books on abnormal psychology!" is not the way to start your research.

Where do these clichés come from? Like many clichés, they probably have roots in some real situations that tend to be more visible than other less flashy ones. There are many transwomen driven to sex work in order to survive, because their families have cast them out, their schools did not protect them from bullying and companies will not hire someone who is visibly gender variant. There are many people who play with gender tropes to get a laugh, from drag queens to people who feel humor eases some social tension when they are unsure of themselves and undergoing medical and social transition. There are some people who crack under the indescribable pressure of transition, and there are even some few people who are just plain crazy and their flavor of insanity directs them to pop in a set of implants and decide that they're a woman just like the person next to them has decided that they are Napoléon Bonaparte. And there are many of us who have suffered somehow at the rough hands of society, and who try to bear this suffering with nobility and move forward from it. But clichés are really just a kind of shorthand that people use to categorize others into comfortable "types", and even when someone seems to fit a cliché, there are always deeper levels. Outside of the easy clichés, there are so many other interesting realities to use when telling your stories. Why not a transsexual computer scientist? A transsexual doctor? A transsexual airline pilot? Click here to look at some amazing transwomen you may never have heard of. You may ask, "Well if they're not going to be a gritty prostitute or a shocking reveal, then why does it even matter that the character is transsexul at all?" EXACTLY!!! IT SHOULDN'T!!! Why not let the character be interesting because of what she feels, says, chooses to do, instead of because of what she "is"?

Assumption of Monolithic Community

Most media people assume transsexuals are a group of like-minded people with the same goals, motivations and beliefs. Actually, there are MANY reasons why people assigned the male gender role at birth decide to adopt things associated with the female gender role, from the aforementioned lipstick and heels to surgeries and the social role itself. These are just a few:

My basic advice, in light of what I've written above, is this: If you really want to step into uncharted territory and do something that hasn't been done before, try to be aware of the clichés, pitfalls and easy-outs that I've mentioned. Try to tell the story of how the issues you're interested in affect a woman who is rejected, hated and disbelieved. A woman who has repaired a disfiguring birth defect. If you advertise for subjects in the back of the local gay rag next to the escort ads, you are going to get responses from one kind of person. If you advertise with fliers at the local college, another. If someone's website has a photo gallery named "My Sexi Leg Pix" and blocky animated gifs of big-eyed asian teeny bopper girls in crop-tops with pink hair blowing kisses... and they are a fifty year old construction worker, then apply the same screening criteria you would when looking for subjects who aren't transgendered. Don't just assume that "that's the way transsexuals are" and stop there because it's easy. The only subject you can find/write is a fifty year old married construction worker? (really?) Then find a fifty year old married construction worker who otherwise fits into society with other fifty year old women, one who is earnest about really being a woman. You can only find/write a sex worker? Then find a bright, inspiring one who is saving that money for school or a home. Because really being a woman, day to day, in relationships and in society, is what transition is about. When all the colorful makeup is washed away, the frilly sexy clothes are replaced with jeans and a white t-shirt, the hair pulled back, the mirror confiscated, does this person still feel like they are a woman? That's the core from where everything else grows.

The showgirls, sex workers, activists (and yes, the "nut cases") are the visible tip of a vast, secret iceberg. There are real transsexual women of all ages, races and careers, living all over the world. Quietly in neighborhoods as members of the PTA, or walking the runways of Milan, in what we call "stealth" with no one knowing their history. We are all around you, if you only care to look.

Hall of Shame

Many of these movies were good or even great pieces of art, but their treatment or use of a transsexual character (stated or implied) was damaging or poor, in my opinion.

Hall of Fame

See more examples of transsexual-interest films at http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/films.html

© Calpernia Addams 2008